Today: 26.Feb.2021

Gary Young, retired engineering manager: It is lamented that far too few of the electorate have any real understanding of the hard sciences. This lack of understanding has given rise to embracing poor (junk) science at even some of the highest levels of academic and political thought. The current concept of most concern is all the political rhetoric about renewables such as solar and wind providing our energy. There is only one well understood technology at the present time that could produce vast amounts of power in addition to fossil fuels and that is nuclear. We are held back from the nuclear solution by unfounded fear. The root of the fear is the very wrong doctrine of “liner no threshold” concerning the biological effects of radiation. In truth, there are thresholds and almost nothing in science is linear.

Published in USA

S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science and Environmental Policy Project. Gerald E. Marsh, a retired physicist from Argonne National Laboratory - Many people believe that wind and solar energy are essential for replacing nonrenewable fossil fuels. They also believe that wind and solar are unique in providing energy that’s carbon-free and inexhaustible. A closer look shows that such beliefs are based on illusions and wishful thinking.

Published in USA

Viv Forbes, Executive Director of the Saltbush Club which opposes the war on carbon energy, opposes real pollution, and promotes the rational and sustainable use of carbon energy and carbon food. Perhaps never before in history have so many people fallen for such a scientifically wrong idea that will cost billions of lives and destroy their own civilization. But millions of people and now school children insist that use of fossil fuels is causing catastrophic man-made global warming and sea level rise. Curious that most of these alarmists live in North America and Europe that fought the brain-washing of the Communist system. The alarmist followers go along like numb hypnotized persons. This may cost humanity its existence as the modern world knows it. Particularly shocking are advocates and experts in nuclear energy who promote it claiming that fossil fuels are causing climate catastrophe.

Published in Australia

Uli Weber, geophysicist and author of Klimahysterie ist keine Loesung: From 2020 onwards, the industrialized nations of the world want to spend 100 billion US dollars annually on a " Green Climate Fund " to the rest of the world - in gratitude for their signature under the Paris climate treaty to the global decarbonization up to the year 2100. Just to fulfill our pecuniary climate obligations from this "Green Climate Fund", we are no longer able to avoid a CO 2 tax with falling tax revenues. And the next global UN octopus is already in the starting blocks to spread the last of our economic resources for alleged biodiversity conservation across the globe.

Published in Germany