Today: 27.Sep.2020
John Shanahan

John Shanahan

John Shanahan, civil engineer, editor Many nuclear power organizations, experts and advocates focus on claims that nuclear can help solve so-called man-made global warming crises and claim nuclear power can save the world from man-made climate "tipping point" crises. They also claim that nuclear power (the best energy source in the world) should work with wind and solar (the worst energy sources to operate the modern world. For half a century nuclear power organizations have failed to solve real problems in their own industry. This has allowed anti-nuclear forces to easily gain control and effectively stop this wonderful energy source. This article describes some steps the nuclear power industry must take in order to survive.

Thorpe Watson, Ph.D. in Physical Metallurgy & Science of Materials. Thirty five year career covering wide range of science disciplines plus 10 year investigation of the climate controversy: Climate is always changing and has exhibited at least four major climate cycles. For example, Canada has been covered with a mile-thick ice sheet more than 23 times during the current Holarctic-Antarctic Ice Age. Why is Russia increasing its Arctic fleet of nuclear powered icebreakers? Is the real estate market overwhelmed with ocean-front properties because of alleged, accelerating sea level increases? Are harbour masters having to deal with unusual sea level increases? The correct answers to the foregoing questions provide ample reason to reject the alarmist message.

Simon Aegerter, physicist, Jon Boone, analyst-observer of the real world, Bruno Comby, nuclear engineer, Michel Gay, nuclear advocate, Roger Higgs, geologist, Eric Jelinski, chemical-nuclear and mechanical engineer, university lecturer, John Shanahan, civil engineer, Willie Soon, astrophysicist: Discussion on man-made global warming, climate tipping point, fossil fuels, nuclear power. This is a discussion of different thoughts for what lies ahead for Earth's climate and energy sources? Many people in this discussion see a wholesome climate and better living with fossil fuels and nuclear power, if people avoid intense hate, massive stupidity and all-out war. One person is concerned about carbon dioxide from fossil fuels causing serious global warming leading to an irreversible climate tipping point and end of life as we know it today. Others are concerned about a breakdown of personal and economic freedoms and productivity caused by alarmists creating a one-world government with losses of freedom and private ownership. This is already happening with elected officials forcing the stopping of use of fossil fuels and nuclear power and irrationally imposing use of wind and solar energy and central governments taking absolute control of the economy.

Roger Higgs, geologist, Founder, Geoclastica Ltd. It's vital that the public, and especially our children traumatised by outrageous 'climate anxiety' thanks to the self-interested inept IPCC and the clueless scare-mongering media, learn the truth about the Sun, Earth's climate, and hugely beneficial CO2.

GEOCLASTICA LTD TECHNICAL NOTE 2020-9. This 3-minute read makes it glaringly obvious that, unsurprisingly, climate change (including current global warming) is driven by our inconstant star, the Sun; CO2 is irrelevant. Naturally the United Nations IPCC claims the exact opposite, due to its grotesque in-built bias, i.e. 'climate scientists', a newly invented profession of opportunists whose careers DEPEND on public belief that perfectly natural, unthreatening global warming is man-made. IPCC's monumental blunder, catastrophic for society's wellbeing, is costing western economies $$trillions in needless efforts to reduce harmless (hugely beneficial) CO2. WHO AM I? A 66-years-old published independent geologist with a doctorate in geology (University of Oxford 1982-86) and 35 years' worldwide geological consulting experience, I'm now in my 5th year of self-funded (hence impartial) literature research, integrating ALL scientific aspects of climate change, including geology, archaeology, oceanography, meteorology, glaciology, astrophysics and palaeoclimatology, as opposed to 'climate science' (mostly computer modelling, 'Garbage in, garbage out'). We've been had.

Tagged under