global warming

Keen to survive when dead-calm, freezing weather sets in? You’d better have access to nuclear or fossil-fuelled power sources, simply because wind and solar generators are bound to deliver absolutely nothing, at all.

The United States and Canada have a lot to collaborate on in the nuclear energy field, and they seem to be doing a good job of it. Each country is considering each other’s reactor designs and each has funded or chosen to review some of those from both countries.

An advantage of the high-temperature heat from an IMSR plant is that it would be delivered as a molten salt mixture using an inexpensive pipe loop, using an approach already in industrial use today. As a result, the IMSR power plant can replace fossil fuels in producing hydrogen and ammonia, chemical processing, and new applications such as clean synthetic transport fuels.

First, there is the question of CO2 saturation. Second, what happens when we double CO2, and third, is any heat generated when CO2 absorbs IR radiation?

All the energy absorbed during the day from the sun is lost to space during the night.

The UN/IPCC, NASA/NOAA, and their servile "scientists" and "universities," the media, and the politicians have been deceiving the scientifically unsophisticated public about the catastrophic global warming caused by human-made CO2 and the greenhouse effect. We will use simple words and concepts and provide data and the science to show why that cannot happen.

In Part I the paper summarizes how the UN/IPCC presents an incomplete and misleading picture of the Earth’s Energy Budget. How it tells us nothing about other sources of heat besides the sun, like the earth’s nuclear furnace or how oceans act like a climate moderator given its huge heat capacity. PART II presents 11 arguments against CO2 caused global warming. Explaining in simple terms and concepts, the difference between real-physical greenhouses and the misleading term of the “greenhouse effect.” It also explains the challenges posed by the concept of “Radiative Forcing.” Part III summarizes policy recommendations and procedural changes for NASA/NOAA

As America goes down the Green rabbit hole, chasing Germany and the UK’s failing efforts, China and Russia should be sending Thank You cards for the gift to control America’s energy needs.

America is in a fast pursuit toward achieving President Biden’s stated goal that “we are going to get rid of fossil fuels.” Today, Biden supports and encourages banks and investment giants to collude to reshape economies and energy infrastructure with their Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) divesting in fossil fuels movement. ESG is an extremely dangerous precedent as the American people never voted to give banks this sort of control over our country.

Global warming is widely recognized as an existential threat that will have horrific consequences if left uncontrolled. The intent of this article is to create a call to action for our industry to unite in promoting nuclear energy as the best way to combat this threat.

Politicians, their advisors, the mainstream media, schools, universities, investment companies, and the United Nations IPCC COP claim that CO2 from fossil fuels is causing catastrophic man-made global warming and that the world must stop using fossil fuels. These claims are wrong and will cause billions of people to suffer or die from lack of energy and by-products from fossil fuels.

M. Ragheb in Global Climate Variation, Change and Energy Use, 2019 on pages 16 and 17, he spells out clearly the natural sources of CO2 and man’s contribution. Of the 186 billion tones of CO2 entering the atmosphere annually, 180 billion tones come from nature and 6 billion tones are man’s contribution. My simple math says 6 divided by 186 is 3%.

The IPCC in its own research produces a similar finding in a published graph “Global Natural and Anthropogenic Sources and Absorption of Greenhouse Gasses in the 1990’s”, finding, CO2 from natural causes is 793 billion tones, Man-Made sources is 23 billion tones. 23 divided by 793 is 2.9%.

This ratio of Natural CO2 versus Man-Made CO2 is never brought forward mathematically, in context, in any discussions of the causes for Climate Change. This is not any kind of conspiracy; it is quite simply strong assumptions. If you track the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere it follows exactly with the burning of fossil fuels since the beginning of the Industrial revolution and the selling of coal fired steam engines. Also, it corresponds directly with proven increases in Global temperatures. You put 2 and 2 together you get 4 . . . a no brainer. Unless you go back in time and compare previous cycles of Climate Change on Planet Earth. You find NO correlation between Global Warming and CO2 going back at least 10,000 years.

Here is a link to the source statement of the 3% CO2 contribution by humans - See pages 16 and 17, - 6 billion tons/186 billion tons = 3%:

. .

Every recent study describing Climate Change has failed to look back at these 5 Warming Periods before 1750. This all happened during our current Inter-Glacial Period on Planet Earth. The Roman Warming Period and The Middle Ages Warming Period must be used and compared to the current 20ieth Century Warming Period. This is only looking back to the times of Anthony and Cleopatra or to the years of Henry the Eighth and Charlemagne. It's not some intentional distraction with Dinosaurs and Early Creation. In planetary terms, this is just looking back to Yesterday Afternoon, in Planet Earth’s long and dynamic History . . . Failure to do so is a Scientific Travesty . . . that MUST be Corrected!

We must learn from History - NOT push it under the rug out of site, out of mind . . .

However, climate change and CO2 have Never followed one another in link step . . . Scientifically, or Naturally. The warmer Planet Earth gets the more the Oceans and Glaciers release CO2 and forests and vegetation keep it in balance. In an effort to clean up the planet we must separate CO2 from Climate Change. Concentrate instead on cleaning up the pollution attached to CO2 if we are to save the planet from extinction. Remove the Sulphur Dioxide, Methane, Carbon Monoxide, Soot and Ash using existing technology . . . Please!

Here is a link to the source statement of the 3% CO2 contribution by humans - See pages 16 and 17, - 6 billion tons/186 billion tons = 3%:

. .

TRCS, The Right Climate Stuff. Retired NASA Apollo Moon Program Physicists, Chemists, Engineers, Astrophysicists, Physicians, Mathematicians, Geologists and Meteorologist's; An Unusually Objective, Interdisciplinary Team. Retired, So Not Beholden To NASA or The Administration. All Non Paid Volunteers & Not Working For “Big Oil”, Big Anything. Willing To Risk Impeccable Reputations. Non Political. A Team That Invites Input From Experts On All Sides Of The Issues. CONCLUSION: Human produced CO2 is not leading to Catastrophic Global Warming (CAGW)

No global problem has ever been more exaggerated than climate change. As it has gone from being an obscure scientific question to a theme in popular culture, we’ve lost all sense of perspective.